Forest Studio
  • Home
  • Install
  • Learn
  • The model
  • Thesis opportunities
  • About us

On this page

  • 1 Feuerthalen Case Study
  • 2 Management scenario BAU
  • 3 Dominant Tree Species Classification
  • 4 Management Units considered
  • 5 Management Strategies considered in BAU scenario
    • 5.1 Oak Promotion
    • 5.2 Spruce and Silver Fir
    • 5.3 Beech
    • 5.4 Broadleaf Mix and Ash-Dominated
    • 5.5 Conifer Mix and Broadleaf–Conifer Mix
  • 6 New MU management scenarios
  • 7 Prices and Wood Quality Classes in Feuerthalen
    • 7.1 Wood Quality Classes
    • 7.2 Log Length Classes
    • 7.3 Prices in Feuerthalen

Case Study Feuerthalen

1 Feuerthalen Case Study

We use the public forest of Feuerthalen (Canton of Zurich, Switzerland) as a case study to demonstrate the capabilities of Forest Studio Edu for landscape-level forest management planning. This same landscape is also applied in the Landscape-Level Forest Management course at ETH Zurich.

The Feuerthalen forest covers approximately 105 hectares and features a diverse mix of tree species. Conifers such as Norway spruce, silver fir, larch, and Scots pine coexist with broadleaved species including European beech, oak, ash, sycamore maple, and wild cherry, among others.

Forest area distribution:

  • Productive forest area: 97.59 ha

  • Non-productive stocked area: 0.13 ha

  • Private forest: 7.7 ha

  • Public forest: 97.7 ha

Summary of the area of each of the MU used in the 2014-24 download here the csv file: feuerthalenForest_MUareas_2014-24.csv

MUs and stands 2014

Compartments 2014

New MU used from 2025 (numbers used in Forest Studio Edu)

Figure 1. Overview of the management divisions used in Feuerthalen during the 2014-24 period and the new division.

2 Management scenario BAU

We defined a BAU (Business-As-Usual) management scenario for the Feuerthalen case study based on the 2014–2024 forest management plan information.

The management follows a continuous cover forestry approach (no clear cuts are applied), with thinning from above as the primary intervention type.

It is applied at the management unit (MU) level, with different strategies depending on dominant species and management objectives.

This section describes the criteria used for the BAU management scenario following the management strategies implemented in Forest Studio.

The management plan defines spatial units as stands.
In this BAU scenario, each stand is considered a Management Unit (MU), applying consistent management strategies according to the MU’s land-use type or, where no explicit function was defined, its dominant species.

3 Dominant Tree Species Classification

Dominant species were defined in each MU based on the proportion of basal area, with a species considered dominant if it represented ≥70% of the total basal area.

When no dominant species was present, the MU was classified according to its mixture type, distinguishing among:

  • Conifer mix stands
  • Broadleaf mix stands
  • Mixed conifer–broadleaf stands

4 Management Units considered

We excluded from the simulation all MUs designated as non-forest land uses.

In the BAU scenario, MU 1002 was assumed to have no management, as it is assigned as a forest reserve in the management plan (though it was still included in the simulation).

Meadow areas were assumed to remain unchanged and were excluded from the simulations (MUs 106, 601, 616, 618, and 905).

The Christmas tree farm (MU 620) was also excluded. Consequently, revenues from this activity are not considered, though they could be included after simulation.

We also assumed that the field_stream_wood land type (MUs 904 and 1001) represents narrow riparian strips or wooded stream margins, maintained primarily for erosion control, habitat conservation, or hydrological protection rather than for timber production.
Inventory data indicate no trees present in these MUs, and they were therefore excluded from the BAU scenario.

MU Code Description Notes
106 47_field_meadow_pasture_humus –
311 permanently_open_area Possibly landslide damage
501 37_storage_area –
601 47_field_meadow_pasture_humus –
616 47_field_meadow_pasture_humus –
618 47_field_meadow_pasture_humus –
620 20_christmas_tree_farm Revenue not considered
904 40_field_stream_wood –
905 47_field_meadow_pasture_humus –
1001 40_field_stream_wood –

5 Management Strategies considered in BAU scenario

We defined seven management strategies, assigned to different MUs based on their dominant species (as defined in Section 3) and land-use type.

Target diameters were defined species-specifically according to management recommendations.
For Norway spruce (Picea abies), to reduce bark beetle risk, a lower target diameter of 35 cm (instead of 40 cm) was adopted.

The management plan recommends increasing firewood production, implying reduced target diameters or higher harvest probability in smaller diameter classes.
However, this BAU scenario does not include such adjustments.

The plan also mentions common walnut (Juglans regia), but since the inventory data provide no spatial information and the species is not yet parameterized in Forest Studio, it was excluded from this analysis.

5.1 Oak Promotion

These MUs aim to promote oak (Quercus robur).
This also generates potential income via cantonal subsidies.
The BAU scenario includes only MUs identified as oak promotion areas or dominated by oak.
No radical interventions (e.g., clearcutting or replanting) were simulated, so the oak promotion effect remains conservative.

References:
- Richtlinien Naturschutz im Wald (2017)
- Waldbaufibel (Hessen Forst, 2025)

Management Parameters

Thinning type: From above (a = −5, b = 0.1)
Harvest intensity: Minimum 20%, and maximum 40%
Diameter threshold: 90 cm for oak; 0 cm for all other species
Large wood proportion: Minimum 32% oak basal area; oak > 50 cm retained until this threshold is met

5.2 Spruce and Silver Fir

This strategy applies to MUs dominated by Norway spruce (Picea abies) or silver fir (Abies alba).

Substitution of spruce by Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) or silver fir was allowed where feasible, especially along forest edges.
Conifers were maintained overall, while broadleaves were selectively reduced.

Management Parameters

Thinning type: From above (a = −5, b = 0.1)
Minimum basal area: 25 m² ha⁻¹
Harvest intensity: ≥ 20%, and maximum 40%
Diameter thresholds:
- Spruce (P. abies) — 30 cm
- Silver fir (A. alba) — 30 cm
- Larix (Larix decidua) — 50 cm
- Scots pine (P. sylvestris) — 45 cm
- All broadleaves — 0 cm
Large wood proportion: None

5.3 Beech

This strategy applies to MUs dominated by European beech (Fagus sylvatica), focusing on promoting high-quality beech timber.

Management Parameters

Thinning type: From below (a = −5, b = 0.1)
Minimum basal area: 25 m² ha⁻¹
Harvest intensity: ≥ 20%, and maximum 40%
Diameter thresholds:
- Beech (F. sylvatica) — 60 cm
- Spruce (P. abies) — 30 cm
- Silver fir (A. alba) — 30 cm
- Larix (L. decidua) — 50 cm
- Scots pine (P. sylvestris) — 45 cm
- Others — 0 cm
Large wood proportion: None

5.4 Broadleaf Mix and Ash-Dominated

This strategy applies to mixed broadleaf MUs or those dominated by ash (Fraxinus excelsior).
The goal is to maintain species diversity and mixture.

Management Parameters

Thinning type: From below (a = −5, b = 0.1)
Minimum basal area: 16 m² ha⁻¹
Harvest intensity: ≥ 20%, and maximum 40%
Diameter thresholds:
- Oak (Quercus robur) — 60 cm
- Beech (Fagus sylvatica) — 60 cm
- Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) — 60 cm
- Others — 0 cm
Large wood proportion: Maintain 0.32 (Q. robur), 0.08 (F. sylvatica), 0.28 (F. excelsior)

5.5 Conifer Mix and Broadleaf–Conifer Mix

This strategy applies to mixed conifer or broadleaf–conifer MUs.
The goal is to maintain mixtures while promoting alternative conifers to spruce and avoiding further reduction in softwoods.

Management Parameters

Minimum basal area: 25 m² ha⁻¹
Harvest intensity: ≥ 20%, and maximum 40%
Diameter thresholds:
- Oak (Q. robur) — 60 cm
- Beech (F. sylvatica) — 0 cm
- Ash (F. excelsior) — 60 cm
- Spruce (P. abies) — 30 cm
- Silver fir (A. alba) — 30 cm
- Larix (L. decidua) — 50 cm
- Scots pine (P. sylvestris) — 45 cm
Large wood proportion: Maintain 0.32 for Q. robur

6 New MU management scenarios

In addition to the existing MUs, we created a new MU code that divide the whole are in 5 MUs instead. In Forest Studio Edu the basic managements units are the original MUs but it is possible to filter and plot by the new MUs.

New MU used from 2025 (numbers used in Forest Studio Edu)
NMU Description MUs included Notes
2001 Northern Area 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 617, 619, 620, 621, 622, 1002 Productive (same as BAU spruce fir dominated)
2002 Central Area 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418 Reservoir protection (same as BAU conifer broadlave mixture but with min BA of 30m2/ha)
2003 East Area 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217 Productive (same as BAU spruce fir dominated)
2004 South-Area 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819 Productive (same as BAU spruce fir dominated)
2005 Central south area 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 901, 902, 903, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916 Productive (same as BAU spruce fir dominated)

7 Prices and Wood Quality Classes in Feuerthalen

7.1 Wood Quality Classes

Wood quality is graded from A (highest) to D (lowest):

Class Description Typical Characteristics Main Use
A Top quality Perfectly straight, fine-grained, no knots or cracks Veneer logs, export logs
AB High quality Slight deviations from A (minor knots or color) High-grade sawlogs
B Good sawlog Some knots, mild cracks or curvature Construction, joinery
BC Medium quality More defects, lower yield Pallets, rough sawn timber
C Low quality Cracks, rot, discoloration Firewood, pulp
D Reject / industrial Rotten or heavily cracked Pulp or energy wood

7.2 Log Length Classes

Log length classes follow Swiss and Central European trade standards (Schweizer Holzhandelsgebräuche).

Code Meaning Typical Log Length (m) Common Use
L1 Short log 3.00–4.00 Industrial wood, short sawlogs, pulpwood
L2 Medium log 4.01–5.49 Standard sawlogs for construction timber
L3 Long log 5.50–7.00 (up to 8.00) High-value sawlogs, structural/export wood

7.3 Prices in Feuerthalen

Below are 2025 price tables (broadleaves and conifers) from the main client in Feuerthalen.
Prices remain valid until revoked.
A deduction of 2.00 CHF m⁻³ applies for non–FSC-certified wood.

  • Prices in CHF m⁻³ over bark
  • Diameter class = mid-log diameter (cm)
  • Sorting = Swiss/Central European trade norms
  • Higher letters = higher quality

Validity: Until revoked
Discount: –2.00 CHF m⁻³ (non-FSC wood)
Payment terms: 30 days, 2% discount

7.3.1 Broadleaved Species Prices 2025

7.3.1.1 Beech (Fagus sylvatica)
Diameter class (cm) A AB B BC C D
3a (30–34) 75 70 65 65
3b (35–39) 80 75 70 65
4a (40–44) 100 95 85 80 73 65
4b (45–49) 110 100 90 85 75 65
5 (50–59) 130 115 100 90 80 65
6 (60+) 150 125 105 95 90 65

Notes: Red heartwood → C; tension or cross cracks → C/D.


7.3.1.2 Oak (Quercus robur)
Diameter class (cm) A AB B BC C D
3a (30–34) 70 65 60 60
3b (35–39) 100 85 75 60
4a (40–44) 300 250 220 150 90 60
4b (45–49) 320 260 230 160 95 60
5 (50–59) 400 345 290 195 110 60
6 (60+) 500 415 330 220 120 60

Notes: Ring shake not allowed in B; decayed or wormy logs → D.


7.3.1.3 Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), Lime (Tilia spp.), Elm (Ulmus spp.)
Diameter class (cm) A AB B BC C D
2b (25–29) 85 60 60 60
3a (30–34) 90 80 70 60
3b (35–39) 100 90 75 60
4a (40–44) 140 130 120 100 80 60
4b (45–49) 150 140 130 105 90 60
5 (50–59) 190 155 145 115 95 60
6 (60+) 220 180 160 130 105 60

7.3.1.4 Sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), Wild cherry (Prunus avium), Pear (Pyrus communis), American red oak (Quercus rubra)
Diameter class (cm) A AB B BC C D
3a (30–34) 75 70 65 60
3b (35–39) 80 73 65 60
4a (40–44) 170 130 100 80 70 60
4b (45–49) 180 140 110 90 70 60
5 (50–59) 200 155 125 95 80 60
6 (60+) 230 185 140 100 80 60

7.3.1.5 Alder (Alnus glutinosa), Birch (Betula pendula), Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), Hornbeam (Carpinus betulus), Norway maple (Acer platanoides)
Diameter class (cm) A AB B BC C D
3a (30–34) 75 70 65 50
3b (35–39) 78 70 65 50
4 (40–49) 110 80 70 65 50
5 (50–59) 150 130 90 80 65 50
6 (60+) 190 160 100 80 65 50

7.3.1.6 Poplar (Populus spp.)
Diameter class (cm) A AB B BC C D
3a (30–34) 55 50 50 40
3b (35–39) 55 50 50 40
4 (40–49) 55 50 50 40
5 (50–59) 70 65 60 55 50 40
6 (60+) 70 65 60 55 50 40

7.3.2 Coniferous Species Prices 2025

7.3.2.1 Norway spruce (Picea abies) — L2 + L3
Diameter class (cm) B BC C D
1b (15–19) 55 53 50 50
2a (20–24) 85 80 75 50
2b (25–29) 105 95 85 50
3a (30–34) 110 103 95 50
3b (35–39) 110 103 95 50
4 (40–49) 105 95 85 50
5 (50–59) 95 90 85 50
6 (60+) 95 88 80 50

7.3.2.2 Silver fir (Abies alba) — L2 + L3
Diameter class (cm) B BC C D
1b (15–19) 50 50 50 50
2a (20–24) 75 70 65 50
2b (25–29) 95 85 75 50
3a (30–34) 100 90 80 50
3b (35–39) 100 90 80 50
4 (40–49) 95 85 75 50
5 (50–59) 85 80 75 50
6 (60+) 80 75 70 50

7.3.2.3 Larch (Larix decidua) — L3 preferred
Diameter class (cm) AB B BC C D
2a (20–24) 60 55 55 55
2b (25–29) 80 70 60 55
3a (30–34) 120 100 70 55
3b (35–39) 200 160 120 80 55
4 (40–49) 320 200 153 105 55
5 (50–59) 380 220 175 130 55

A qualities by agreement.


7.3.2.4 Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) — L1–L3
Diameter class (cm) A AB B BC C D
2a (20–24) 50 50
2b (25–29) 60 55 50 50
3a (30–34) 70 60 55 50
3b (35–39) 80 70 60 50
4a (40–44) 140 120 105 85 65 50
4b (45–49) 180 150 125 95 65 50
5 (50–59) 200 170 140 105 70 50
6 (60+) 260 200 170 110 75 50

7.3.2.5 Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) — L3 preferred
Diameter class (cm) AB B BC C D
2a (20–24) 60 55 55 50
2b (25–29) 80 70 60 50
3a (30–34) 120 100 70 50
3b (35–39) 130 110 80 50
4 (40–49) 140 120 105 50
5 (50–59) 160 135 120 50

A and AB qualities by agreement.